• NEW DAY NEW TOYS

    New-ToysI’ve redeemed my HSBC’s reward points last week, and yesterday, I’ve got it. A Victorinox travel organiser and an Oral-B Vitality tooth brush, powered by Braun. Excellent. Incredibly fast by HSBC reward center, less than two weeks. Unlike Maybank, I got my Omron electronic weighing scale after more than a month.

    I also made an order for two pairs of Crocs, Tideline and Prepair. My wife’s colleague was the dealer or something like it. They told that they can sell several types of Crocs with a very tempting price (the price is around half of the retail price). Rejected stuff, they said. I’m always a big fan of Crocs but they retail price for each pair is rather ridiculous, although I have to admit that they make excellent flip-flops and shoes. Amazingly light and comfy.

    Unfortunately, due to the crazy out-of-the-world orders they received, they can only fulfill my Tideline request. The others, including my wife’s, had to be cancelled, or delayed, or whatever, but they did refund. I received my pair yesterday, thanks to Ms Wawa, my wife’s friend. I rushed back home to try it out. I knew it would fit nicely, because I tested the size few days back at Crocs in One Utama. My size is 9, but they said Crocs’ sizes are one step smaller, so I ordered size 10. Got it unpacked, I slipped my left foot in (my wife gets angry whenever I put on my shoes, starting with the left side). Whoaaaa! It didn’t fit as it should be. I checked the size again. Still, it shows 10 (42). Why? I thought I got it tested the other day. Or did I test on 11?

    Aaaaahhhhh there goes my raya shoes. Bummer =(

    PS: Going to Timberland today haha…


  • I WANT ONE !

    MAC-OS-X-Snow-Photoshop-EditBetter. Faster. Easier. Next-generation technologies. More accessible than ever. Exchange support. The world’s most advance operating system.

    These are the few advantages listed by Apple for their newly released Mac OS X Snow Leopard (v10.6). Very tempting to me, yet I have been using Leopard (v10.5.8) for just about 2-3 months. Surely, there are lots more to discover and to be learnt. But the temptation of the new OS has been haunting me in my sleep. For just US$29, it’s pretty much within range.

    PS: Should I?

    PSS: For those who’s in my bandwagon, do visit abdusfauzi. There you can find few good reviews for Snow Leopard, from installing, all the way up to problem solving. More to come!


  • WHAT IS RON ?

    A few people came to me to better understand what RON actually is, and it is quite a nuisance nowadays, right after the fuel price went up, yet again. Oh, the fuel price is up? Has anyone notice it? Not really though, because it happened quite discretely few days ago. Hardly noticeable. Brilliantly, the RON issue is covering up the few extra cents margin from promised price, once ago.

    I have no heart to bash the price hike today as I feel more technical. So let’s get going on understanding what RON is.

    A lot of people have been complaining about their engines are rougher than ever, louder than usual, no initial pick up at the start, blabla here blabla there, when they started to use RON95 fuel. I think these are only psychological effects of being on the other side of the river from the government. I don’t mind people criticising the price though, but what came across is more people are complaining RON95 instead of the price.

    What is RON? RON stands for Research Octane Number, technically is a resistance measure of fuel to detonate in a fuel combustion engine. The higher the number is, the higher the resistance of the fuel to detonate. This means, higher RON is needed for higher compression ratio vehicle, to avoid engine knock, or premature fuel detonation (explosion due to high compression, not spark ignition). So basically, lower compression ratio vehicles (surely, lower performance cars) won’t be needing such a high RON number. You can fill up with RON97, but there will be no significant result. You can use up to RON300 (if any) if you like, but there will be no improvement in terms of power or fuel consumption.

    Let me put it this way. Imagine that you’re buying a bulletproof vest. You have two options. Option number one, a half inch thick vest which can take, say, a .35 calibre bullet, priced at RM1000. Option number 2 is an inch thick vest which can take maybe .45 calibre bullet, and the price is RM2000. And now imagine that in this world, the maximum calibre of the biggest gun is .30. Tell me now, why would you choose option number 2? To feel safer or you just have too much money to spend? This situation applies on the dilemma of RON95 (vest number one) and RON97 (vest number two).

    Get it?

    To sum it up, there is no pros and cons between RON95 and RON97. RON95 suits the lower performance vehicles, and RON97 for higher performance vehicles. Unless you mess it up. So there is nothing to blame on the fuel rating. The blame should go to you as a car owner. You should start reading the vehicle’s manuals (I can bet only 5% of Malaysians read the manual book provided by the vehicle’s manufacturer) before saying something recklessly.

    This confusion is pretty much the same like engine lubrication oil. Everybody thinks that full synthetic oil is the best for all car as it is lighter and more durable. Not necessarily, friends. For vehicles 10+ years old, full synthetic oil will only fork your money more and more. It does not lubricate your engine enough and does not transfer the heat efficiently. Moreover, the thin profile of the oil will easily leak out through minor openings of the old engine. And we actually don’t need those super duper 5W-50 full synthetic rating for our cars, practically in Malaysia’s climate. 50 means that the oil can ‘tighten up’, not to be too thin in a 50 degree Centigrade or above, while 5W means it can actually ‘loosen up’ to be as thin so that it can flow nicely at minus 20 degree Centigrade or lower.

    Now guys, tell me, where the hell in Malaysia can we find a place as hot as 50 degree Celcius or as cold -20 degree Celcius? You’re actually spending more for nothing, thinking that you car has increased its power by using more expensive oil, yet you actually doing silly thing by unnecessarily damaging your cars internal parts. A mere placebo indeed. P/S: Just my two cents. Correct me if I’m wrong.

    PS: My two cents. Let me know if I’m wrong.


  • A&J’S VISIT TO KEMAMAN

    It was sahur time when I got a text from A, my Form 3 Sejahtera (the ‘enlightened’ class) classmate, saying that he’s on his way to my place with his fiance, J. He told me the day before that he will start his engine as early as after sahur, but knowing him so well before, I didn’t buy that. He proved me wrong earlier today by arriving at my place (infact, for the first time to Kemaman) around 0900, plus 30-40km away from track.

    There are probably few purposes of his visit here, including meeting and old friend and visiting my newborn son, but surely the top of the list is to sell his MZ 5G product (no offense A. Cheers!).

    I believe the duo did a good job convincing us to purchase their insurance product, although we had to have a 4-way conference through the speakerphone later tonight to make sure we fully understand everything. I believe all insurance companies have a main policy of making policies which no one will understand the first time (second, third, fourth… We still don’t fully get a firm hold on it) they look at it. Numbers, words, tables… Just too complicated to get a grip, which is why the agents come into picture.

    J is obviously the sharper one (longer experience helps) than A, but A seems to catching up quickly (men has better verbal skills of convincing people, trust me). No matter what, they did good job. Honesty and transparency are the criteria that I look for in n insurance or unit trust agent, and I can find those criteria in both of them. They worked hard (coming all the way to Kemaman to meet only one client proves that) to build up better career, and of course, to fill up their savings accounts as quickly as possible for their coming soon marriage.

    Oh, you are getting married Mr.A! How nice to hear someone I know is getting married.

    We closed the deal with me getting so close to purchase their product. I will finalize it latest tomorrow, and the deal can be closed soon after.

    A, thank you for your visit. Although there’s a financial purpose, I still appreciate it as you’re the first Old Boy to have come to my house, here in Kemaman. Work hard dear brother, as rewards come to only two kind of people, the Luckies and the Hardworkers.

    Luck comes and goes.


  • LET US PONDER UPON THIS!

    I’ve got this article, forwarded to me by my wife, forwarded to her by who knows… Wherever it came from, it sure as hell gives good vision and respectively near-perfect accuracy of facts, although we, as the citizen, barely know about all the country’s financial details. Even so, this article below is written based on real time fact and the number figures are closed enough to the figures we always see in the newspapers or TV.

    Have a good read. I’m not influencing any of you to be on the other side of the G, but as always, the decision is yours to make. I will always go against the G, no matter what they do…even giving me a cash money of RM625 yearly. RM625??? What a good laughing material.

    How true, read on.

    Today Tenaga stock rose by about MYR1.00. Volume traded in excess of 35 million units. Yesterday Tenaga stock was suspended. Put these points together.

    1. If you know that an announcement would be made on Wednesday that TNB rates will be revised upwards you would surely buy Tenaga shares on Tuesday.
    2. If you own an investment bank or have sufficient credit line with an Investment Bank you would have bought as much as you could knowing that the price will surely go up.
    3. Since you have to pay within 3 days (T+3 rule), you would have planned to sell on Friday. So you could have bought 1Million Tenaga shares on Tuesday and sold it today for a cool MYR1Million profit without paying any money (perhaps some borrowing costs for 2-3 days).
    4. Of course none of us are privy to the announcement of the fuel hike, but the family of the PM are privy to it.
    5. Of course none of us have a large credit line with an Investment Bank but the family of the PM owns an investment bank.
    6. Why the surprise announcement on 05 June when the PM has said that it would be in August? Well you can only make a big and quick profit if you control the timings and surprise others.
    7. For those in the know (the powers that be and their cronies) this has been one hugely profitable week buying and shorting the related shares. The poor rakyat had to queue just to fill up their tanks and perhaps save between MYR20-MYR100.

    Now read below…..

    Need those in know of the basic economics of crude, fuel etc to comment.WHAT IS NEVER MENTIONED IN Mainstream Media like NST/TheStar/Utusan/BH are these facts….Malaysian Per Capita Income USD 5000 VS Singaporean Per Capita Income USD 25000. Further The Star made a comparison of prices in Thailand , Singapore and Indonesia . For Thailand it is quoted at RM3.90/liter, however are they aware that in Thailand new cars are cheaper than Malaysia by RM10,000? They pay only one life time for their driving license? No renewal fee after that? Also that goes for road tax as well? And do TheStar also aware that you can drive all the way from Hadtyai to Bangkok on a six lane highway without paying any Tolls ??!!Whereas here in Malaysia you have to pay yearly renewal for road tax , driving license and TOLLS, TOLLS, TOLLS!!!

    For Singapore how can you quote RM 5.20 ? Please quote in Singapore Dollars because they are earning in Singapore Dollars. You might as well say Europeans are paying RM10/liter. RM5.20/liter = Sing $ 2.20/liter, still cheaper than Malaysia in view of fact that Singapore is not a crude oil exporter. Are you saying that you fill up petrol in Singapore by paying Ringgit?

    In economy, dollar to dollar must be compared as apple to apple. Not comparing like durian in M’sia is much cheaper than durian in Japan!! Of course, Japan is not durian producer!!! Comparing Malaysian durian with Thailand durian make more sense!!

    For Indonesia we might say is cheaper there at RM2.07/liter but compare that to their level of income!Now, let us compare the price with OIL PRODUCING countries:

    UAE – RM1.19/litre
    Eygpt – RM1.03/litre
    Bahrain – RM0.87/litre
    Qatar – RM0.68/litre
    Kuwait – RM0.67/litre
    Saudi Arabia – RM0.38/litre
    Iran – RM0.35/litre
    Nigeria – RM0.32/litre
    Turkmenistan – RM0.25/litre
    Venezuela – RM0.16/litre
    MALAYSIA – RM2.70/litre!RM 2.70!!!

    Individual perspective:As of last month a Toyota Vios would ’cause a damage’ of about RM 89,000.In the international market, a Toyota Vios is about USD 19,000USD 19,000 = RM 62,700 (using the indicative rates of USD 1 = RM 3.30). That makes Malaysian Vios owners pay an extra RM 26,300.This RM 26,300 should be cost of operations, profit and tax because the transportation costs have been factored in to the USD 19,000.RM 26,300/ RM625 petrol rebate per year translates to a Vios being used for 42.08 years. I do understand that the RM 625 is a rebate given by the government, but it also means that one has to use the Vios for 42.08 years just to make back the amount paid in taxes for the usage of a foreign car. Would anyone use any kind of car for that long?Now with these numbers in front of us, does the subsidy sound like a subsidy or does it sound like a penalty? This just seems to be a heavy increment in our daily cost of living as we are not only charged with high car taxes but also with a drastic increase in fuel price.

    With all the numbers listed out, I urge all Malaysians to join me in analyzing the situation further.Car taxation is government profit, fuel sales is Petronas’ (GLC) profit which also translates into government profit. The government may ridicule us Malaysians by saying look at the world market and fuel price world wide. Please, we are Malaysians, we fought of the British, had a international port in the early centuries (Malacca), home to a racially mixed nation and WE ARE NOT STUPID!!!

    We know the international rates are above the USD 130/barrel. We understand the fact that the fuel prices are increasing worldwide and we also know that major scientist are still contradicting on why this phenomenon is happening. Some blame Bush and his plunders around the world and some blame climate change and there are others which say petroleum ‘wells’ are getting scarce.

    Again we go back to numbers to be more straight fwd 1 barrel = 159 liters x RM2.70/liter = RM 429 or USD 134 On 1 hand, we are paying the full cost of 1 barrel of crude oil with RM2.70 per liter but on the other hand the crude oil only produces 46% of fuel. Malaysia sells crude oil per barrel at USD130, buys back fuel per barrel at USD134. And not forgetting, every barrel of fuel is produced with 2 barrels of crude oil. 1 barrel crude oil = produce 46% fuel (or half of crude oil), therefore 2 barrel crude oil = approximately 1 barrel fuel. In other words, each time we sell 2 barrels of crude oil, equivalently we will buy back 1 barrel of fuel. Financially, Malaysia sell 2 barrel crude oil @ USD 130/barrel = USD 260 = RM 858. Then, Malaysia will buy back fuel @ USD 134/barrel = RM 442/barrel. Thus, Malaysia earn net extra USD 126 = RM 416 for each 2 barrel of crude sold/exported vs imported 1 barrel of fuel !!!(USD 260-134 = USD 126 = RM416). So where this extra USD 126/barrel income is channeled to by Malaysian Govt????????? Another analysis: 1 barrel crude oil = 159 liters. 46-47% of a barrel of crude oil = fuel that we use in our vehicles. 46% of 159 = 73.14 liters.@ RM 2.70/liter x 73.14 liter = RM197.48 of fuel per barrel of crude oil. This is only 46% of the barrel, mind you. Using RM 3.30 = USD 1, we get that a barrel of crude oil produces USD 59.84 worth of petrol fuel (46% of 1barrel). USD 59.84 of USD 130/barrel turns out to be 46% of a barrel as well.Another 54% = bitumen, kerosene, and natural gases and so many more. And this makes a balance of USD 70.16 that has not been accounted for. So this is where I got curious. Where is the subsidy if we are paying 46% of the price of a barrel of crude oil when the production of petrol/barrel of crude oil is still only 46%? In actual fact, we still pay for this as they are charged in the forms of fuel surcharge by airlines and road taxes for the building of road (because they use the tar/bitumen) and many more excuse charging us but let us just leave all that out of our calculations.

    As far as I know, only the politicians who live in Putrajaya and come for their Parliament meetings in Kuala Lumpur (approximately 60+ km) are the ones to gain as they claim their fuel and toll charges from the money of the RAKYAT’s TAX. It is so disappointing to see this happen time and time again to the Malaysian public, where they are deceived by the propaganda held by the politicians and the controls they have over the press. Which stupid idiot economist equates rebates for rich or poor with the cc of the vehicles? An average office clerk may own a second hand 1300cc proton Iswara costing $7,000 (rebate = $625) while the Datuk’s children can own a fleet of 10 new cars of BMW, Audi and Volvo all less than 2000cc costing $2 millions and get a total rebate of $625 x 10 = $6,250! Wow what kind of economists we are keeping in Malaysia…wonder which phD certificate that they bought from…

    Misleading concept of Subsidy: The word ’subsidy’ has been brandished by the government as if it has so generously helped the rakyat and in doing so incurred losses. This simple example will help to explain the fallacy:

    Example: Ahmad is a fisherman. He sells a fish to you at $10 which is below the market value of $15. Let’s assume that he caught the fish from the abundance of the sea at little or no cost. Ahmad claims that since the market value of the fish is $15 and he sold you the fish for $10, he had subsidised you $5 and therefore made a loss of $5.

    Question : Did Ahmad actually make a profit of $10 or loss of $5 which he claimed is the subsidy?

    Answer: Ahmad makes a profit of $10 which is the difference of the selling price ($10) minus the cost price ($0 since the fish was caught from the abundance of the sea). There is no subsidy as claimed by Ahmad. The government claims that it is a subsidy because the oil is kept and treated as somebody else’s property (you know who). By right, the oil belongs to all citizens of the country and the government is a trustee for the citizens. So as in the above simple example, the government cannot claim that it has subsidised the citizen!

    Let us all ponder…